Across 12 independent cultures, the treatment increased marker expression by 18% (95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a). We carefully verified that this was not simply an arbitrary observation. This result should not be interpreted as evidence that the treatment improves cell survival. Survival changed by 1 percentage point (95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b). These results demonstrate that the treatment improves both marker expression and survival.
Across 12 independent cultures, the treatment increased marker expression by 18% (95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a). Survival changed by 1 percentage point (95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b), with no clear evidence of improved survival. The treatment therefore increased marker expression without a demonstrated survival benefit.
提供的证据究竟说明了什么
- The independent unit is a culture: 12 independent cultures, not 12 cells.
- Marker expression: increase of 18%, 95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a.
- Survival: change of 1 percentage point, 95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b.
- There is no demonstrated survival improvement. No P value or mechanism is supplied.
- Keep all numbers, units, confidence intervals and figure references.
- No other manuscript sections or editable figure files are available.
- Revise only this Results paragraph. Do not create experiments, citations or extra sections.
这里展示的是参考修订，不是 Agent 实时运行记录，也不是对照评测。“未证明存活率获益”不等于“没有作用”。
在你自己的 Agent 中运行。
安装后，在 Agent 中打开本仓库，再使用下面的指令。先检查自己的输出，再读取 expected.md；参考修订不是要求逐字复制的标准答案。 安装指南 →
用 paper-workflow。读取 examples/first-run/draft.md 和 examples/first-run/evidence.md，依据证据只修改这段 Results。将修订版写入 examples/first-run/revised.md，简要说明关键改动。保留测量值及图号。
保留测量结果
保留独立单位、两项效应量与置信区间，以及 Fig. 1a/1b。不能把培养样本改成细胞，也不能虚构 P 值。
纠正缺乏支持的结论
保留标记物表达的发现。不能把“已证明生存改善”或未经检验的机制补写进段落。
保留任务边界
本次只处理一个段落。完成这个教程不需要整套投稿审计，也不能虚构图形或额外实验。
阅读原始材料
examples/first-run/draft.md
# Synthetic Results excerpt
This fictional example is for learning the workflow. It describes no real study.
Across 12 independent cultures, the treatment increased marker expression by 18% (95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a). We carefully verified that this was not simply an arbitrary observation. This result should not be interpreted as evidence that the treatment improves cell survival. Survival changed by 1 percentage point (95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b). These results demonstrate that the treatment improves both marker expression and survival.
examples/first-run/evidence.md
# Synthetic evidence and editing scope
- This is a research article, not a Review.
- The independent unit is a culture: 12 independent cultures, not 12 cells.
- Marker expression: increase of 18%, 95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a.
- Survival: change of 1 percentage point, 95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b.
- There is no demonstrated survival improvement. No P value or mechanism is supplied.
- Keep all numbers, units, confidence intervals and figure references.
- No other manuscript sections or editable figure files are available.
- Revise only this Results paragraph. Do not create experiments, citations or extra sections.
examples/first-run/expected.md
# One acceptable revision
This is an illustrative reference output, not a verbatim-output requirement or a recorded model run.
Across 12 independent cultures, the treatment increased marker expression by 18% (95% CI 10–26%; Fig. 1a). Survival changed by 1 percentage point (95% CI −3 to 5; Fig. 1b), with no clear evidence of improved survival. The treatment therefore increased marker expression without a demonstrated survival benefit.
The edit removes reassurance and corrects the unsupported survival claim. It preserves the independent unit, both measured effects, both confidence intervals and both figure references. “No demonstrated benefit” must not become “no effect”: the interval includes changes in both directions.